Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Glenn Barker's avatar

I started out writing formal verse, and churned out over forty Shakespearean sonnets (decasyllabic, occasionally iambic), but the rhyming form broke me Mike.

By poem number fifty I could no longer do it. It was something of a ball ache, and funnily enough I wrote a poem in rhyme soon after the end of sonnet writing about my prosthetic after testicular cancer. Then came free verse, and I never looked back. 😎

Expand full comment
Alex Oliver's avatar

You’ll be glad perhaps I’m too pooped to comment at length. The article let me realise its language I like, hence free forms. And I like Plath for economy. Just today I read that Huxley said of Edith Sitwell and her ‘Dadaist’ verse, the sense is governed by the rhyme. Which is like greenwashing tyres cos you ran out of white.

Again hence free verse. It must be how the (gormless) mind works: I can rebuild engines cos of how they bolt together. But there’s no Haynes manual of poetry cos it’s something you create: not the rule book whatever.

I imagine somebody once wrote in whatever style because it came naturally.Subsequently people copied and you can tell. When writing songs I often abandoned them trying to rhyme and follow metre. It might be clever in s Pam Ayers way, but it’s what one might rank as low brow like tabloid headlines.

My poor brain even fails to make sense reading it. Perhaps I hide my fickniss in my sesquisyllabic symposia?

Entertaining read in my momentary lucidity.🤑👍

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts